Selected work

Evidence, context, and the operating decisions behind the result.

Case studies explain the initial condition, Allen’s contribution, the system implemented, and what the available reporting can—and cannot—support.

Reviews and ratings report for the multi-location automotive engagement
Full case study

Multi-location automotive reputation management

~12 to 130+ weekly reviews in the documented launch comparison

A governed request, response, escalation, and reporting system across 19 locations.

Read the full case study →
Painting contractor rank grids showing expanded top-three Google Maps coverage
Local visibility operations

Google Business Profile optimization and map visibility

Top-three map coverage from 14% to 31% during a seven-week engagement

A structured visibility engagement for a Pennsylvania painting contractor, covering profile foundations, content cadence, citations, and grid-level rank measurement.

Read the full case study →
Allen Quay visual summary: LifeCare Dental moved from 67 to 86 Google reviews and from a 3.7 to 4.0 rating in the first 30 days
Healthcare reputation operations

LifeCare Dental: patient feedback and review growth

67 to 86 Google reviews in the first 30 days

A dental practice used post-visit feedback requests and review monitoring, then tested SMS outreach in a later phase.

Read the full case study →
Boardwalk Vapes report showing Search views up 44 percent and Maps views up 70 percent
Retail local search performance

Boardwalk Vapes: local visibility and customer actions

Maps views up 70% · Calls and direction requests up 67%

A retail smoke and vape shop in Destin, Florida, with documented gains in profile visibility, customer actions, and a selected local ranking comparison.

Read the full case study →

Evidence standard

Claims should be useful without pretending to be more certain than the source allows.

  • Original source and measurement period where available
  • Comparable settings and calculation notes
  • Allen’s contribution separated from other factors
  • Anonymous treatment when client naming is restricted
  • No guarantee that another engagement will produce the same result

Start with the problem

Have a similar operational problem?

Review the evidence, then continue the conversation on Upwork with the context behind your situation.

Continue the conversation on Upwork